SEO Tools
Tools to help you build and market your website.

Have a Question?

If you need feedback or have any burning questions please ask in the community forum so we can get them sorted out.

Overview of site contents. Includes site map, glossary, and quick start checklist.
Contains information about keywords, on page SEO, link building, and social interaction.
Tips on how to buy traffic from search engines.
Learn how to track your success with organic SEO and PPC ads. Includes information about web analytics.
Creating a credible website is core to being linkworthy and selling to customers.
Learn how to make money from your websites.
Audio & Video
Links to useful audio and video information. We will create new SEO videos every month.
Exclusive member only interviews.
Coupons and offers to help you save money promoting your websites.
Site Map
View all our training modules linked to on one page.

Google Algorithm Updates

There are a number of algorithm update logs available online.

We don't aim to be the most comprehensive, but rather to highlight some of the more important changes in terms of their impact on the field of SEO. The biggest & most impactful updates (like Florida, Panda & Penguin) are bolded.

Current Google SERP volatility is shown in the following widget from SEMrush.

Year by Year Index of Historical Google Updates

2003 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

How Algorithm Updates Work

Google launches hundreds to thousands of minor algorithm updates each year. Larger updates happen roughly every other month to quarterly. The aim of most smaller updates is to improve specific features and relevancy matching while having limited potential adverse impact on the seach ecosystem as a whole. Larger updates have far more widespread impacts and can have flux which lasts for weeks as search engineers adjust ranking factors in part based on feedback from end users and publishers about the algorithm update.

As the web changes publishing strategies and monetization strategies change. Google tries to improve user experience by delivering precisely what they believe the user is searching for. In many cases that means showing a featured snippet, a knowledge box with information about an entity, or a vertical search result above the traditional 10 blue links. If and when Google sends users to third party websites they want to ensure those websites also deliver a clean user experience where solutions are easy to find.

As the web changes Google search engineers update their search quality evaluator guidelines [PDF] which are used by thousands of freelance workers to grade how well Google is doing in terms of delivering a quality search experience.

The following video by Google search engineer Paul Haahr describes what his job is like and how they measure ranking success.


November 16th: the Florida Update was when SEO first got complex enough to where many people started needing the help of external experts. Before this update one could easily rank well by buying lots of links using the anchor text they wanted to rank for & repeating a keyword on the page. This is the update that introduced nuance into SEO. Google rolled out this huge update while they were still powering Yahoo! Search & before Yahoo! switched to their own in-house search algorithm.


  • January 18th: Nofollow launched to allegedly curtail comment spam. Google would later shift the purpose of this tag from fighting blog comment spam to something which should be required on any paid links. After about 15 years Google later changed their policies stating they may count some nofollow links for rankings as they would treat nofollow as a hint rather than a directive. They also announced rel="ugc" & rel="sponsored" when they announced the change to rel="nofollow" would go into effect on March 1, 2020.
  • June 28th: Search personalization features added so websites you visit regularly may be ranked higher in the search results. Later on Google would further enhance personalization by increasingly localizing the search results, both within a particular country and down to the city level. In 2014 Google even started going more granular like down to the neighborhood level in some larger cities. As online news ad budgets crumbled newspapers became more partisan to maintain audience by feeding a constant drip of confirmation bias to readers. This economic shift in news creation along with social networks that amplified outrage caused the rise of what Eli Pariser's book The Filter Bubble, Donald Trump getting elected as president of the United States, and savvy marketing by DuckDuckGo forced Google to dial back on personalization of the search results outside of localization.


May 16th: Google rolls out Universal Search which mixes YouTube, news & other vertical search types into their core index. Later they add their knowledge graph and a variety of paid-only verticals in areas like hotel search, flight search, financial products, product/shopping search. Some verticals change over time to include free tiers (shopping search, flights search) or are retired (financial offers).


August 25th: Google Suggest auto-completes user search queries after they start typing their search query, which attempts to drive them down well worn paths, further minimizing traffic sent to misspellings and some lesser searched for longtail phrases. 


February 20th: The Vince Update is where we started the whole "brand, brand, brand" stuff. This happened *after* the financial crisis, when Google's revenue growth stagnated & Google share prices plunged. March of 2009 was the bottom of the stock market plunge, when congress pushed FASB to allow for widespread accounting games by relaxing mark-to-market requirements. By promoting brands Google achieved a number of key objectives:

  • took much of the risk out of result rankings
  • defunded a lot of independent SEO-only or excessively SEO-focused publishing efforts
  • shortened the information supply chain
  • consolidated ad spend back toward Google
  • increased the perceived importance of the search channel (paid and organic) to large brand advertisers
  • increased the awareness of already popular brands & gave them extra incentive to bid on their branded keywords (even though the economics of bidding on their own brand typically did not make sense for advertisers as it cannibalized their organic search clicks & taking advantage of selection effect)
It’s plain to see that junior’s no marketing whiz. Pizzerias do not attract more customers by giving coupons to people already planning to order a quattro stagioni five minutes from now. Economists refer to this as a "selection effect." It is crucial for advertisers to distinguish such a selection effect (people see your ad, but were already going to click, buy, register, or download) from the advertising effect (people see your ad, and that’s why they start clicking, buying, registering, downloading). Tadelis asked how exactly the consultants made this distinction.

When you bid on your own brand, you are frequently paying to capture an audience you would have already reached without spending that money.

Brand keyword advertising, the presentation informed him, was eBay’s most successful advertising method. Somebody googles "eBay" and for a fee, Google places a link to eBay at the top of the search results. ... Three months later, the results were clear: all the traffic that had previously come from paid links was now coming in through ordinary links. Tadelis had been right all along. Annually, eBay was burning a good $20m on ads targeting the keyword ‘eBay’.

Microsoft - which owns the Bing search engine - also did a study showing most brand-bidding on your own brand wastes money.

At Microsoft, Rao had a search engine at his disposal: Bing. Following the news about the millions of dollars eBay had wasted, brand keyword advertising only declined by 10%. The vast majority of businesses proved hell-bent on throwing away their money.

If brand bidding offers such a horrible ROI why do so many advertisers still do it? Largely for job preservation of the internal marketing team and external markeitng consultants. Anyone who looks at the data without understanding selection effect will think the numbers are better than they are. Plus if the consultant gets a percent of spend and has required ROI metrics to meet then ignoring the brand cannibalization makes the numbers look better than they are with little to no effort AND allows them to increase ad spend on other keywords by using the phantom profits to meet an overall ROI goal.

He graciously admitted that he either added or omitted data to his model if it led to the ‘wrong’ results. Lewis: "I was like: oh man. All of that is bad scientific practice, but it’s actually great job preservation practice.


September 8th: Google Instant turned Google suggest the default search behavior. On July 26, 2017 Google turned off this feature, but in the 7 years it existed it helped consolidate search query volumes into tighter buckets which users still rely on as they type, particularly on mobile devices.


  • February 24th: Panda Update 1.0 impacted 12% of queries, US & English only.
  • April 11th: Panda Update 2.0 (about 7 weeks later) impacted about 2% of queries, incorporated user block signal, hit eHow & was rolled out internationally in the English language.
  • May 10th: Panda Update 2.1 (about 4 weeks later)
  • June 16th: Panda Update 2.2 (about 5 weeks later) allegedly improved scraper detection (though Google has still asked for help on this front)
  • July 23rd: Panda Update 2.3 (about 5 weeks later)
    • Google analytics changes (that further obfuscated some data)
      • July 28th - Google blended image traffic in core search traffic by default. Previously they were seen as separate traffic sources.
      • August 11th - changed session handling, which increased visit counts while offsetting that with lowering time on site metrics, higher bounce rates, and such.
  • August 12th: Panda Update 2.4 (about 3 weeks later) rolled out to foreign languages with the exception of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. impacted 6% to 9% of search queries.
  • August 24th: (about 2 weeks later) not an official update, but a number of folks here that were using the subdomain work-around to get out of Panda saw their sites whacked on the 24th.
  • September 28th: Panda Update 2.5 (about 10 weeks since August 12 update)
  • October 4th: flux on Panda 2.5.1. After publicly complaining about being hit again Daniweb recovered once again (along with some other large sites), showing how responsive Google is to public relations issues.
  • October 13th: Panda 2.5.2
  • October 18th & 19th: Panda 2.5.3
  • November 11th: Panda 2.6/3.0
  • December 13th: Panda 3.1
  • December 19th: a smaller / minor Panda 3.2 update


  • January 16th & 22nd: Panda 3.2, which was claimed to be folding data in rather than an algorithm update
  • January 19th: Ad Heavy Update 
  • March 23rd: Panda 3.4 
  • April 19th: Panda 3.5 
  • April 24th: Penguin update penalized aggressive low-quality link building. They also rolled out an on-page spam classifier to further obfuscate the update. Further, notice how Panda updates were included tightly on either side of this to make the weekly "what changed" SEO services have many changes appear all at once so that it is harder to isolate variables & impacts.
  • April 27th: Panda 3.6 
  • May 16th: Knowledge graph implemented. Google begins to re-represent the world's knowledge by hosting it directly rather than indexing content and sending traffic elsewhere.
  • May 25th: Penguin 2 / 1.1 
  • June 8th: Panda 3.7 
  • June 25th: Panda 3.8 
  • July 17th: Japanese & Korean Panda update
  • July 24th: Panda 3.9 
  • August 20th: Panda 3.91 
  • September 18th: Panda 3.92 
  • September 27th - October 3rd: Panda 4.0 / 20 impacted 2.4% of search queries
  • September 28th & 29th: EMD update lowered the rankings of exact match domain names
  • October 5th: Penguin 3 
  • October 9th: Ad Heavy Update 2 penalized sites with a heavy ad load
  • November 5th: Panda 21 
  • November 17th: Stealth update which hit MetaFilter and a number of other sites. The MetaFilter penalty was allegedly a false positive, but it went uncorrected for over a year, causing mental health issues & forced the founder to step away from the business.
    [Google's Matt] Cutts said, “Oh yeah, I think you’re ensnared in this update. I see a couple weird things. But sit tight, and in a month or two we’ll re-index you and everything will be fine.” Then like an idiot, I made some changes but just waited and waited. I didn’t want to bother him because he’s kind of a famous person to me and I didn’t want to waste his time. At the time Google paid someone to answer his email. Crazy, right? He just got thousands and thousands of messages a day. I kept waiting. For a year and a half, I waited. The revenues kept trickling down. It was this long terrible process, losing half overnight but then also roughly 3% a month for a year and a half after. It got to the point where we couldn’t pay our bills. That’s when I reached out again to Matt Cutts, “Things never got better.” He was like, “What, really? I’m sorry.” He looked into it and was like, “Oh yeah, it never reversed. It should have. You were accidentally put in the bad pile.”
  • November 21st: Panda 22 
  • December 21st: Panda 23 





  • January ~ 8th - 11th: update to the core ranking algorithm
  • Feb 23: Google shifted from showing up to 8 right rail textads & up to 3 top ad units to showing no right rail ads (unless they are shopping ads) and showing up to 4 ad units at the top of the search results. Around the same time Google announced they were shutting down their Google Compare / Google Advisor vertical shopping comparison service which operated in markets like credit cards, mortgage rates and insurance. A couple days later Google added more whitespace between the search results to further push the organic results below the fold.
  • March 3, 14 & 21: adjustments which appear to be related to phantom updates (thus related to search quality / Panda).
  • May 11: mobile friendly update 2.0 now live.
  • June: Phantom/Quality update #4
  • July 26: broad roll out of Google AdWords expanded text ads, which further displace organic results by pushing them below the fold on more devices.
  • September 1st: local update
  • September 2 (ongoing throughout month): likely a quality update, either new singal reweighting or a quite major data refresh. (I believe this was them testing Penguin 4).
  • September 20: Google AMP live in mobile search results in categories beyond news.
  • September 23: Penguin 4.0 live. real-time updates & more granular impacts rather than sitewide hits.

  • November 10 & 18: tested update which was rolled back



  • February 15: Chrome to begin ad blocking on sites it deems to have a poor Ad Experience based on the Coalition for Better Ads standards.
    Chrome will remove all ads from sites that have a “failing” status in the Ad Experience Report for more than 30 days. Assessment of participating companies’ compliance conducted in connection with the Program will be based on measureable, empirical thresholds that establish the frequency of display of ad experiences that do not comply with the Standards. In the initial phase of the Program’s operation, the threshold for non-compliance for web sites will be measured according to the following percentages of page views assessed:
    • 7.5% in the first two months following the Effective Date of the Program
    • 5% in the ensuing four months
    • 2.5% in the months thereafter
  • Early March: Core algo update, focused on search quality. The update was rolled out over time in multiple waves, with significant volatility in the results on the 7th & 14th, followed by another wave of volatility on the 18th & 23rd.
  • March 26: Google began broadly rolling out mobile-first indexing, which uses the mobile version of a page as the canonical version.
  • April 16: Core ranking algo updated once more. Glenn Gabe wrote about how the March & April updates tie together.
  • July 9th: mobile page speed became a ranking factor for search (previously the speed signal was focused on desktop searches)
  • July 24th: pages not using HTTPS are marked "not secure" in Chrome 68.
  • August 1st - 7th: broad core update which had a significant impact on sites in the health category & some other your money your life (YMYL) categories.

  • August 22nd: yet another update
  • September 18th - 20th: elevated volatility
  • September 24th: for their 20th anniversary Google announced improvements to visual search, adding a news feed to the default search homepage, grouping related searches in journeys & more layers to the knowledge graph. Some branded search queries now include classification groups at the bottom of the search results for things like storage companies, computer manufacturers, multinational corporations, etc.
  • September 26th - 27th: elevated volatility
  • October 31 - November 7th: unnamed update


  • February 27: increased volatility shown on multiple rank trackers
  • March 12: Google announced a broad algorithm update, which was significant enough that WebmasterWorld founder Brett Tabke dubbed it Florida 2.0, though it is unrelated to the original Florida update from 2003. So far it appears some sites with eggregious anchor text repetition were hit hard, while the apparent anchor text adjustment also coincided with a rescoring of other search quality-based algorithms. Many sites which were hit on the August 1st update in 2018 recovered according to many of the rank monitoring tools. Google also stated the update was not associated with any major change in their neural matching technology: “Neural matching has been part of our core ranking system for over half-a-year. None of the core updates we have confirmed coincided with some new use of neural matching,” the company said.
  • April 7: Major reverberation on the above Florida 2.0 update. It appears Google is mixing in showing results for related midtail concepts on a core industry search term & they are also in some cases pushing more aggressively on doing internal site-level searches to rank a more relevant internal page for a query where they homepage might have ranked in the past. Google also has some issues with many pages being dropped from their search index.
  • April 27: minor update, perhaps a continuation or rescoring of the above update which began on March 12th.
  • June 3 - 8: another major core update. the Daily Mail's Mail Online lost half their organic search traffic & 90% of their Google news feed traffic
  • June 4 - 6: update to promote increased result diversity by typically limiting the number of results that can appear from any individual domain (inclusive of subdomains) to 2 results in cases where the user intent is not navigational to that particular site
  • July 11-13: unannounced update with a further spike in ranking volatility on the 18th
  • September 10th: Google announced they would treat rel="nofollow" as a hint versus a directive & also launched rel="ugc" for user generated content & rel="sponsored" for links which are based on financial compensation.
  • September 24th: another core update which seemed to have increased weight on link authority relative to the weight placed on engagement for a particular keyword.
  • September 24th: Google announced a new meta tag which limits snippet performance on featured snippets. This will go live in the middle of October & these will operate as directives versus hints.
    • individual options
      • "nosnippet" = if featured snippets can be used
      • "max-snippet:[number]" = how many characters can be shown in a featured
      • "max-video-preview:[number]" = how many seconds of an animation can be shown in a preview
      • "max-image-preview:[setting]" none, standard or large = limit size of preview images shown. This can also be used in AMP.
    • examples
      • <meta name="robots" content="max-snippet:75, max-image-preview:standard, max-video-preview:10">
      • <meta name="robots" content="nosnippet">
    • In addition, there is a new data-nosnippet attribute which can be applied to specific spam, div & section elements within a page to prevent that portion of the page from appearing in search snippets.
      • example usage <p><span data-nosnippet>Peanut butter</span> is the most delicious food. Period.</p>
    • The new granular snippet controls are a core plank in Google's efforts to play hardball with publishers & evade compulsory copyright fees to European news publishers as the Article 15 copyright directive goes into effect in October. Much like how efficient PPC markets have marketers bidding against one another to see who can hand Google more money, French news publishers will either appear with little to no supplemental information (& thus get few search clicks), apply for a broad-based exemption to show full listings, or use the granular controls to set how much of their content appears in search. Those who opt to show more information will likely garner better user engagement, more search traffic, more influence & higher rankings.
  • October 22nd to 25th: Google rolled out BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), a Rankbrain like neural network-based technique for natural language processing to better understand the user intent of search queries & rank documents which match the searcher's intent. A before and after example they gave was a person searching for travel information to the United States from Brazil may have previously seen an article about a US person visiting Brazil but will now get the result directionally correct, returning documents about how Brazillians can visit the United States.
    by applying BERT models to both ranking and featured snippets in Search, we’re able to do a much better job helping you find useful information. In fact, when it comes to ranking results, BERT will help Search better understand one in 10 searches in the U.S. in English, and we’ll bring this to more languages and locales over time.
    Dawn Anderson did a deep dive review on the technology associated with BERT here. Google's Pandu Nayak described the ranking signal update as "the single biggest change we’ve had in the last five years — and one of the biggest from the beginning."
  • October 30th - November 1 & November 9th: More unannounced updates, including a later confirmed update which used neural matching in local search.
  • December 17th - December 19th: Another unannounced update, which appeared to have increased the weighting on link equity.


  • January 13 - January 16: Another broad core update

    When Google rolled out the above update they shifted their default desktop search results to using favicons like they do by default on mobile devices
  • January 22nd: Google announces de-dupliation between organic search results & the featured snippet. Featured snippets now count as one of ten organic listings & if a page appears in the featured snippet spot it won't be repeated in the remaining organic results.

    Some advertisers saw an immediate jump in thier ad CTR after the new search layout was announced. In response to broader web criticism from sites like TheVerge Google stated they would test other layouts.
  • February 7-8th: unannounced update
  • March 1st: Link rel="nofollow" attribute becomes a hint versus a directive for ranking purposes.
  • March 2nd: Update appears to have granularized some cross-country localization

  • March 23rd: Unnanounced update which either seemed to place more weight on link diversity or lower the dampening on links relative to other ranking signals.
  • May 4 - May 18: Google update
  • June 3rd: Google announced they now redirect some featured snippet clicks to the relevant section of the associated web page

    This change could have a significant impact on the earning power of some rankings:
    "With this, searchers may skip down past ads and/or call to actions to jump directly to the relevant content. SEOs should take measures to track if your site is doing this in Google search, and possibly replace your ads/call to actions in a more appropriate location."
    Publishers can opt out of appearing in featured snippets by using the nosnippet tag.
  • August 10th: Google rolled out a dumpster fire core algorithm update they quickly reverted and referred to as a glitch in their indexing system

  • October 1st: Google announced they have 2 indexing issues they are looking to resolve around canonicalization and mobile indexing.

  • October 15th: Google's Search On virtual event with Prabhakar Raghavan mentioned the following search information and organic search relevancy advancements.
    • 15% of daily search queries are still unique
    • 10% of search queries are misspelled
    • Google BERT is now used on almost every English language search query.
    • Using neural nets enables them to provide listings of diverse subtopics when a person searches on a broad topic like home exercise equipment: "we can now understand relevant subtopics, such as budget equipment, premium picks, or small space ideas, and show a wider range of content for you on the search results page."
    • Google will soon launch a feature called passage-based indexing which focuses on identifying individual passages in a web page and ranking them based on their relevancy. This feature will...
      • roll out later this year
      • impact about 7% of Google search queries off the start
      • better rank relevant key passages on larger pages even if the page itself is about a broader, different or less relevant topic.
      • allows them to search across key segments of video content and direct searcher attention to what they believe are the most relevant segments.
    • The video outlining these updates is below
    • ~ November 15: subtopic rank - Google adjusted their search relevancy ranking algorithms on core terms to include results for subtopics, which they suggested impacted 7% of search results.

    • December 3 - December 16: Google announced a major broad search quality update. On November 9th some sites which were algorithmically suppressed had their ability to rank improve, so presumably for many of those sites Google has now collected enough engagement metrics to re-adjust their rankings based on end user enagement data. In a subsequent tweet they stated the update would take 1 to 2 weeks to fully roll out, then in a third Tweet said the update was complete on December 16th.


    • February 10: Passage ranking was rolled out in the English language in the United States. Google anticipates when the change is rolled out globally it will impact roughly 7% of search queries. This feature allows sections of longer & deeper pages on broader topics to rank higher for search queries relevant to a specific section of the page. Think of it as being the sort of opposite of the hyper-focused stub page eHow or Mahalo type sites were known for, where a section of an in-depth research paper can now better rank for a specific topic covered in a section within it.
    • February 16: unconfirmed algorithm update
    • Mobile-first indexing for all sites: on July 21, 2020 Google's Yingxi Wu announced Google was pushing back the mobile-first indexing date from September 2020 to March 2021.
    • April 8 - 22: Ecommerce reviews update. Google recently rolled out a parasitic spam offering focusing on the most widely searched for products. To make room for promoting their spam they launched a product reivew update which nuked the rankings of some smaller affiliates so the traffic hit other big ecommerce players would see on Google's inorganic promotion of their thin spam layer would be partly offset.
    • User Experience Signals: On May 28, 2020 Google search ecosystem director of engineering Sowmya Subramanian announced Google will incorporate user experience directly into rankings in 2021. The post mentioned...
      • they would give webmasters at least a 6 month lead time before rolling out the new ranking algorithm
      • AMP would no longer be required to appear in Top Stories
      • this update will incorporate existing metrics (mobile friendly design, safe browsing, using HTTPS, no intrustive interstitial ads) along with new metrics from Core Web Vitals measuring loaing speed, interactivity and visual stability, as shown in the following graphic
        Search Page Experience Graphic.
      • Here is a great article about layout shifts from webfonts.
    • June 2 - 12: Broad core update rolled out. Update analysis available on SEL. The update concluded on June 12th.
    • June 15 - September 2: Google began a slow roll out of page experiences update, which is anticipated to last through August.
    • June 23: Google rolled out a spam update which was completed on the same day it rolled out. They also promised a second spam update the subsequent week.

    • June 28: Second part of the spam update.
    • July 1 - July 12: July core update timed perfectly for a long holiday weekend so that many people who are not penalized but invested heavily in SEO think they were penalized over the weekend while traffic is lower from the holiday weekend and nobody is at work.
    • July 23: Google rolled out an algorithm update which penalized ... erm ... aggressive link building. They only announced the start of that update on the 26th as the "link spam update" & stated the update will roll out over 2 weeks. In the post announcing the update they took a dim view of unlabeled affiliate links (suggesting the use of rel="sponsored") & guest posting on other websites for link building (hinting rel="nofollow" should be used). On August 24 Google announced the update was complete.
    • August 17: Google started using on-page headings and internal anchor text more frequently when they decide to rewrite page titles shown in the search result snippets.
    • October 14: Continuous scrolling of the SERPs on mobile devices.
    • November 3 - 11: Google spam update, which concluded on November 11th.
    • November 17 - 30: core updatem which ended on the 30th
    • December 1 - 21: product review update
    • ...


    • February 22 - March 3: Desktop page experience update.
    • March 23: Google rolled out their third major product reviews update in the past 12 months. The update will happen over a couple weeks.
    • May 25 - June 9: Core update begins roll out.
    • July 27 - August 2: English-language product review update
    • August 11: Google announced an update which lowered how frequently they showed featured snippets when a correct answer was unclear / less certain, along with other "information literacy" aspects.
    • August 25 - September 9: On August 19th Google announced a helpful content update which would begin over the next week and last for roughly 2 weeks. On August 25th the announced the update had started rolling out that morning.
      • The update is based on a sitewide classifier which demotes sites which are perceived to have volumes of unhelpful content published.
      • The classifier runs continuously & the flag may take months to disappear from a site which is flagged for demotion. If Google sees all of the problem has been cleaned up it will still be an additional couple months from that date before the penalty is cleared.
      • The update is expected to roll out of the course of a couple weeks for the English language globally, and then apply to other languages later.
      • Barry suggested the update would be large & could likely be grouped with Florida, Panda & Penguin in terms of impact.
      • The update ended on September 9th & had a fairly weak impact compared to most prior major announced updates. In terms of impact it was nothing like the big updates mentioned above.
    • September 12 - September 26: September 2022 Core Google update rolled out.
    • September 20 - September 26: September 2022 product reviews update rolled out.
    • October 19: October 2022 spam update began rolling out.
    • December 5: December 2022 helpful content update rollout began. Completed on January 12, 2023.
    • December 14: December 2022 link spam update using SpamBrain. Completed on January 12, 2023.



    • March 5: Google announced they were complying with the European Union's Digital Markets Act. As part of that post they mentioned: "changes to our Search results may send more traffic to large intermediaries and aggregators, and less traffic to direct suppliers like hotels, airlines, merchants and restaurants."
    • March 5 ~ April 19 + May 6: Update sandwich consisting of the following elements
      • March 2024 core update was concluded on April 19, though Google did not announce it until April 24.
        • When they announced the update was complete they provided a ranking update feedback form that they stated would be live until May 31.
        • The ranking feedback form requested search query, what page you think should appear in the top 10 results, and any additional optional details along with a bullet point selection between the following options (where a user must select one):
          • My page no longer ranks in the top 10 results for this query.
          • My page is in the top 10 results but no longer as high as it was.
          • Someone else's page should be ranking in the top results for this query.
          • All or most of the top results are generally poor for this query.
          • A few or some of the top results are poor for this query.
          • It's a general issue / something else.
      • Helpful content update - they also published a companion clarifying FAQ page mentioning there are many signals & mentioned helpful content is now becoming core algorithm, so going forward there won't be separate helpful content updates
      • Spam update - the initial portion of the spam update was completed March 20, though some new policies will begin enforcement on May 5 to give publishers time to adjust their practices
        • Expired domain abuse - uses an example of placing a casino site on a prior trusted domain that expired
        • Scaled content abuse - many pages created with the intent of manipulating search results (applies based on perceived intent, if one does it manually or using AI content generation)
        • Site reputation abuse - the "goog enough" issue highlighted on BlindFiveYearOld, where newspapers or other trusted sites syndicate content for a third party & leverage the core domain trust to rank content where the main publication is not exercising editorial control.
          • Google clarified syndicating press releases or normal news syndication deals are not a problem, but syndicating coupons or similar with no editorial oversight is a problem.
          • Far off topic content that is not published in an obvious "advertorial" format is also a problem.
          • Google stated some of the new site abuse policies will begin enforcement on May 5, 2024.
            • On Twitter Danny Sullivan announced enforcement of the site reputation abuse policy began on May 6, 2024.
            • Many sites which were engaging in the activity deleted the associated sections of their site or blocked them from indexing using robots.txt.
    • May 14: Google announced they were rolling out AI Overviews on search results inside the United States for all searchers, and that the feature would roll out globally by the end of the year. They also showcased multi-step advanced features launching soon, which will allow processing of more complex search queries.
    • June 20 - June 27: June 2024 spam update, with a ~ 1 week roll out period. It was a broad & general spam update, and did not focus specifically / exclusively on link spam.
    • June 25: Google dropped continuous scroll from desktop search results & stated they will do the same on mobile in the coming months.
    • July 5: Google will no longer crawl & index web pages that do not render on Googlebot Smartphone.
    • The End of History and the Last Man
    • ...

    Other Algorithm Update Lists

    Here are a few third party algorithm update lists & tools...

    • Google - the borg's official list, which starts in 2020 and runs up to present
    • Google Update Calendar
    • VisualSoft - an interactive infographic going back to 2003
    • Moz - a fairly comprehensive listing
    • RankRanger - similar to the Moz page
    • Sistrix - a more limited timeline
    • Maria Haynes
    • Panguin Tool - Google Analytics overlay. there's another quick penalty analysis tool here
    • Dave Davies put together a 3 part retrospective on the history of search via Matt Cutts: 2000-2005, 2006-2010, & 2011-2014
    • Google's guide to monoitoring and debugging search ranking issues including algorithm update-related issues.
    • A guide to Google Search ranking systems - Google detailed many of their current ranking subroutines and past ones which have been retired.
      • Active
        • BERT - an AI system for understanding the intent behind various word combinations
        • Crisis Information systems - provides SOS alerts and access to support systems for individuals
        • Deduplication system - compares the content of top ranking pages & filters out near identical repeats
        • Exact match domain system - a ranking routine which aims to prevent an exactly matching domain from counting too much toward ranking in general web search
        • Freshness system - boosts the rankings for fresh results when there are signals a query deserves freshness. such signals include a spike in search volume or many news publishers covering a topic.
        • Helpful content system - boosts ranking of content which is believed to have been written by people for people with intent of being helpful, rather than an entity using automation to chase search traffic
        • Link analysis system and PageRank - analyzing the quality, quantity, and anchor text of links into a site & into a particular page
        • Local news systems - surfaces local news
        • MUM - AI used to improve feature snippet callouts & improve COVID-19 vacine information searches
        • Neural matching - AI system used to understand representations of concepts in search queries and web pages, matching them together where there is a strong fit.
        • Original content systems - systems which aim to rank original reporting and other original content above other publishers who cite or rehash original reporting.
        • Removal-based demotion system - remove content deemed illegal including non-consentual explicit issues and DMCA takedowns. repeatedy removals can lead to sitewide demotions or even indexing issues.
        • Page experience system - gives rank preference toward pages with a good user experience. includes signals like mobile friendly layout, lack of intrusive interstitial ads, and pages which are served quickly and over HTTPS.
        • Passage ranking system - AI system used to rank sections or "passages" within a broader web page.
        • Product reviews system - aims to better reward sites offering in-depth original research and reviews by experts & enthusiasts.
        • RankBrain - AI system which relates words with concepts to return relevant results even if those lack the exact words used in a search.
        • Reliable information systems - ranking routines which aim to surface authoritative pages and demote low-quality content.
        • Site diversity system - limits the number of results from any site to 2, unless the search query is deemed to be navigational or there is some other reason to rank more results from a singular domain.
        • Spam detection systems - SpamBrain and other spam detection systems which work to demote content and behaviors deemed to violate Google's spam policies.
      • Retired
        • Hummingbird - ranking system improvement launched in August 2013.
        • Mobile-friendly - gave preference to content formated well on mobile devices. associated signals baked into page experience system.
        • Page speed - announced in 2018. associated signals baked into page experience system.
        • Panda - announced in 2011 to fight low quality content & folded into core in 2015.
        • Penguin - launched in 2012 to fight link spam & folded into core in 2016.
        • Secure site - announced in 2014. associated signals baked into page expereince system.

    Search Flux Monitors

    These are tools which use a seed set of keywords and compare today's search results against yesterday's results & then compare how much the recent change has been against the typical daily churn.